Skip to main content

How Can Banks Improve Regulatory Compliance in a Changing Environment?

Updated on
23 March 2026
Follow Us
02 February, 2021

Regulatory compliance is critical for protecting customers, maintaining trust, and ensuring the stability of the financial system. It defines how financial institutions protect customers, maintain market integrity, and safeguard the stability of the broader financial system. Banks operate within a framework of laws, prudential standards (prudential standards are regulatory requirements designed to ensure the financial soundness of banks), and conduct rules (conduct rules are regulations that govern the behaviour and ethical standards of banks and their employees) designed to prevent the catastrophic failures that have shaken global markets in recent decades. Compliance regulations are essential legal and procedural frameworks that banks must follow to ensure regulatory adherence, protect stakeholders, and adapt to evolving risks. Regulatory compliance in banking matters because it underpins the trust customers place in financial institutions, ensures the safety of the financial system, and helps prevent financial crime and systemic crises.

The 2008 global financial crisis exposed serious gaps in risk management and capital adequacy, leading to taxpayer-funded bailouts exceeding USD 700 billion in the United States alone. More recently, enforcement actions in 2023 and 2024 have underscored the ongoing vigilance of regulatory authorities. These events have driven significant changes in the regulatory framework, impacting the banking industry and shaping compliance requirements across global financial markets. The US Department of Justice imposed a USD 3.09 billion penalty on TD Bank in October 2024 for violations of the Bank Secrecy Act (a US law requiring financial institutions to assist government agencies in detecting and preventing money laundering), while European regulators issued fines totalling over EUR 2 billion for anti money laundering (AML) deficiencies at institutions such as Danske Bank.

Banks must now navigate global frameworks including Basel III, FATF (Financial Action Task Force) recommendations, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), PSD2 (Payment Services Directive 2), and MiFID II (Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II), alongside local rules in every jurisdiction where they operate. These requirements form part of the broader regulatory framework governing the banking industry. InvestGlass, a Swiss sovereign CRM and RegTech platform, helps banks operationalise these regulatory requirements while preserving client data sovereignty (data sovereignty is the concept that data is subject to the laws and governance structures of the country where it is stored) through Swiss or on-premise hosting.

This article, written in British English, is intended for compliance leaders, CROs, COOs, and board members in banks and wealth managers seeking practical guidance on building robust compliance frameworks, with a focus on the importance of regulatory compliance for banking banks.

What is regulatory compliance in banking?

Regulatory compliance refers to a bank’s legal obligation to operate within applicable laws, prudential standards (prudential standards are regulatory requirements designed to ensure the financial soundness of banks), and conduct requirements (rules governing ethical behaviour and customer treatment) across all jurisdictions where it conducts business. Regulatory demands play a central role in shaping the compliance landscape for the banking industry, influencing policy development, compliance monitoring, and risk management strategies to ensure institutions meet evolving legal requirements and maintain integrity. This encompasses everything from capital adequacy (the requirement for banks to hold sufficient capital to absorb losses) and liquidity management to consumer protection and financial crime prevention.

Maintaining adequate capital directly supports financial stability by ensuring banks can absorb losses and continue operating during periods of financial stress.

The practical content of compliance varies significantly depending on business model:

  • Retail banking institutions focus heavily on deposit protection schemes and consumer lending disclosures.
  • Private banking operations emphasise suitability assessments and source of wealth verification.
  • Investment banking divisions manage complex requirements around derivatives trading, large exposures, and market conduct.

Key regulators and frameworks shaping the banking sector

Region

Regulator

Key Focus Areas

United Kingdom

FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) and PRA (Prudential Regulation Authority)

Conduct, prudential soundness, consumer protection

Switzerland

FINMA (Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority)

Capital buffers, too big to fail rules

European Union

ECB SSM (European Central Bank Single Supervisory Mechanism)

Direct supervision of significant eurozone banks

Global

Basel Committee

Capital adequacy, liquidity standards

The FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) oversees approximately 58,000 firms for conduct matters, while the PRA (Prudential Regulation Authority) supervises over 1,500 institutions for prudential soundness. Banking regulations require institutions to maintain compliance across:

  • Prudential requirements (capital ratios, liquidity coverage)
  • Conduct rules (treating customers fairly, suitability assessments)
  • Financial crime prevention (anti money laundering (AML), sanctions screening, fraud detection)

InvestGlass positions itself as a European, non-US, non-Chinese technology partner that embeds these regulatory expectations into client lifecycle automation, digital onboarding and workflow management.

Why regulatory compliance matters: trust, stability and competitiveness

Trust forms the foundation of the banking model. Depositors place funds with institutions they believe will safeguard their money. When that confidence erodes, consequences follow rapidly.

The March 2023 collapse of Silicon Valley Bank demonstrated how quickly trust can evaporate. The bank faced USD 42 billion in withdrawal requests within hours as depositors, many with uninsured balances, rushed to exit. Similarly, Credit Suisse’s demise in 2023, following years of compliance failures including USD 5.5 billion in Archegos losses, resulted in a FINMA-ordered takeover by UBS with a CHF 16 billion government backstop.

Effective compliance reduces compliance risks and the likelihood of financial penalties:

  • TD Bank’s USD 3.09 billion penalty in 2024 represented the largest Bank Secrecy Act (a US law requiring financial institutions to assist government agencies in detecting and preventing money laundering) fine in history.
  • EU AML (Anti Money Laundering) fines reached EUR 1.2 billion across 50 cases in 2023.
  • UK FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) enforcement continues to target firms failing to meet consumer protection standards.

A strong compliance culture supports financial stability by enforcing sound lending practices, capital planning and contingency funding. Basel III capital standards, including the liquidity coverage ratio and net stable funding ratio, ensure banks can withstand stressed market conditions. Maintaining adequate capital directly supports financial stability by ensuring banks can absorb losses.

Banks with reputations for high compliance standards attract more institutional capital, high-net-worth clients, and deposits. Regulatory compliance becomes a commercial differentiator rather than merely a cost centre.

InvestGlass helps institutions evidence compliance to regulatory bodies through audit-ready records, centralised documentation, and automated logs of KYC (Know Your Customer) processes, suitability assessments, and client communications.

Key domains of banking regulatory compliance

Compliance requirements cluster into several concrete domains, each governed by specific laws, regulators, and internal controls. A compliance program (a comprehensive, structured system that integrates policies, procedures, technology, and ongoing monitoring to meet regulatory requirements and mitigate risks) is essential for effective risk management.

Capital adequacy and liquidity

Basel III establishes minimum capital ratios that banks must maintain:

  • Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1): 4.5% of risk-weighted assets
  • Tier 1 capital: 6%
  • Total capital: 8%

Global systemically important banks face additional buffers up to 3.5%. The liquidity coverage ratio requires 100% coverage of net cash outflows over a 30-day stress period, while the net stable funding ratio mandates 100% stable funding over one year. Stress testing became standard practice after 2008, with scenarios simulating GDP drops of 10% or more.

Maintaining adequate capital directly supports financial stability by ensuring banks can absorb losses and continue operating during periods of financial stress.

Conduct and consumer protection

The FCA’s (Financial Conduct Authority) Consumer Duty, effective from July 2023, requires firms to deliver good outcomes for retail customers across price, value, support, and product design. MiFID II (Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II) imposes suitability and appropriateness obligations, product governance requirements, and disclosure requirements that protect consumers from mis-selling.

Financial crime compliance

Anti money laundering (AML) and counter terrorism financing rules follow FATF’s (Financial Action Task Force) 40 standards. EU AMLD 5 and 6 expand coverage to crypto-asset providers and require beneficial ownership registers. UK Money Laundering Regulations mandate suspicious activity reports, with over 650,000 SARs (Suspicious Activity Reports) filed annually. Sanctions screening must cover OFAC (Office of Foreign Assets Control) lists (over 10,000 SDN (Specially Designated Nationals) entries), EU sanctions, and UK autonomous lists updated weekly.

Data protection and cybersecurity

GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) established seven principles for processing personal data, with fines reaching 4% of global annual turnover. The Swiss Federal Act on Data Protection revision in 2023 aligns closely with GDPR requirements. Banks must implement encryption, access controls, incident reporting within 72 hours, and secure digital onboarding processes.

ESG and climate-related compliance

TCFD (Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures) climate disclosures cover governance, strategy, risk management, and metrics. The EU Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation classifies investment products as Article 8 or 9 based on sustainability characteristics. Banks increasingly assess and report climate and sustainability risks.

InvestGlass simplifies these requirements through integrated KYC (Know Your Customer), risk scoring, and transaction monitoring within a single, controlled environment hosted in Switzerland or deployed on-premise.

Consequences of non compliance for banks

Regulators have shifted towards a zero tolerance stance, increasingly focusing on behavioural change and personal accountability. Senior manager accountability regimes, such as the UK’s Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SMCR), hold executives personally liable for oversight failures.

Financial penalties

Recent enforcement actions demonstrate escalating regulatory expectations:

Institution

Year

Penalty

Violation

TD Bank

2024

USD 3.09 billion

Bank Secrecy Act violations (failure to detect and report suspicious activity)

Danske Bank

2023

EUR 2 billion+

AML deficiencies (inadequate anti money laundering controls)

Wells Fargo

2020

USD 3 billion

Fake accounts scandal (creation of unauthorised customer accounts)

Non-financial consequences

Beyond fines, banks face operational risk through:

  • Business restrictions and asset caps
  • Forced product withdrawals
  • Remediation programmes costing billions
  • Delayed licence approvals for new jurisdictions
  • Capital add-ons imposed by supervisors (up to 5% under ECB (European Central Bank) rules)

Reputational damage

Social media and real-time news accelerate the impact of compliance failures. Silicon Valley Bank experienced 40% deposit flight within hours once confidence collapsed. Reputational damage erodes market capitalisation, client relationships, and staff retention.

Operational impacts

Non compliance diverts senior management time, increases reporting process obligations, and forces expensive system rebuilds. Remediation programmes can consume 10-20% of annual budgets.

Using sovereign, well-governed platforms like InvestGlass, which provide transparent audit trails and configurable control libraries, substantially reduces both the likelihood and impact of compliance failures.

Building an effective banking compliance framework

Regulators expect a structured, documented compliance framework covering governance, risk assessment, internal controls, monitoring, and regulatory reporting. To ensure regulatory compliance, banks must adopt proactive and ongoing efforts, utilising comprehensive frameworks and continuous assessment to detect risks, improve operational efficiency, and maintain industry standards.

Governance arrangements

Effective frameworks establish:

  • Board oversight through dedicated risk committees with quarterly reporting
  • A clearly defined three lines of defence model (business ownership, risk oversight, independent audit)
  • Chief Compliance Officer with direct access to the board
  • Clear escalation routes for material issues

Regulatory inventory

Banks should maintain a formal inventory mapping applicable rules to specific policies, processes, and systems, including:

  • PSD2 (Payment Services Directive 2) payment services requirements
  • MiFID II (Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II) conduct and reporting obligations
  • Local banking law provisions
  • Data protection regulations (GDPR, California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), Swiss FADP (Federal Act on Data Protection))

This inventory requires biannual refresh as regulatory changes occur.

Risk assessments

Compliance teams must conduct regular risk assessments rating inherent and residual risk for each business line and jurisdiction. These assessments drive control design and testing plans. High-risk areas such as politically exposed persons or mortgage lending receive enhanced scrutiny.

Policies and procedures

Written policies translate legal and regulatory requirements into day-to-day operational steps for front-office staff, operations teams, IT, and support functions. Vague guidance fails regulatory examinations; specific, actionable procedures succeed.

Training and culture

Effective compliance programmes include:

  • Mandatory annual training covering 95% of staff
  • Targeted modules for high-risk roles
  • Scenario-based workshops
  • Performance measures rewarding compliant behaviour

Independent testing

Internal audit conducts periodic reviews, sample testing of files, and thematic reviews focused on areas like AML, sanctions, conduct, and vendor management.

InvestGlass centralises documentation, approvals, attestations, and evidence within a single platform, enabling banks to implement these components more efficiently.

Core compliance roles and responsibilities in a bank

Compliance is an enterprise-wide responsibility extending far beyond the compliance department.

Board and senior management

Boards set the tone from the top and maintain ultimate accountability. Under regimes like the UK’s SMCR (Senior Managers and Certification Regime), individual senior managers bear personal responsibility for their areas. Directors must challenge management, ensure compliance efforts receive adequate resources, and approve risk appetite statements.

Compliance function

The dedicated compliance department performs ongoing compliance activities:

  • Monitoring regulatory changes (500+ annually in major jurisdictions)
  • Advising business units on regulatory expectations
  • Approving high-risk clients and products
  • Conducting thematic reviews
  • Reporting breaches to regulatory authorities

Front-office responsibilities

Relationship managers and client-facing staff conduct regular risk assessments at the point of client contact:

  • KYC (Know Your Customer) collection and verification
  • Suitability assessments aligned with Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA, a US law promoting accuracy and fairness in credit reporting) and Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA, a US law prohibiting discrimination in lending) requirements
  • Transaction justification
  • Accurate record-keeping

Risk management and internal audit

Risk functions act as the second line, challenging business practices and assessing risks. Internal audit provides third-line assurance, independently testing control effectiveness across the compliance process.

Outsourcing and third-party risk

Responsibility remains with the bank even when activities such as cloud hosting or KYC screening are delegated to external providers. Banking institutions must assess risks posed by third parties and maintain oversight of outsourced functions.

InvestGlass supports clear role-based access controls, approval workflows, and detailed logs documenting who performed what action and when, strengthening governance and accountability.

Challenges in achieving compliance

Achieving regulatory compliance in the banking sector is a complex and ongoing endeavour, shaped by the ever-evolving landscape of regulatory requirements and heightened expectations from regulatory authorities. Financial institutions must navigate a multitude of laws and standards, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), Bank Secrecy Act (a US law requiring financial institutions to assist government agencies in detecting and preventing money laundering), Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA, a US law protecting consumers in electronic payments), and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA, a US law enhancing privacy rights for California residents), each imposing distinct obligations on data protection, consumer rights, and operational transparency.

Keeping Pace with Regulatory Changes

One of the foremost challenges is keeping pace with frequent regulatory changes. Compliance teams are required to monitor updates across multiple jurisdictions, interpret new rules, and adapt internal policies accordingly. This demands a proactive approach, with regular risk assessments to identify emerging compliance risks, particularly in areas such as anti money laundering (AML), counter terrorism financing, and operational risk.

Implementing Internal Controls

Implementing effective internal controls is another significant hurdle. Financial institutions must ensure that their systems and processes are robust enough to meet regulatory requirements, including those set out in the Bank Secrecy Act (a US law requiring financial institutions to assist government agencies in detecting and preventing money laundering), Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA, a US law requiring financial institutions to explain their information-sharing practices and protect sensitive data), and consumer protection laws. This involves establishing clear procedures for:

  • Customer due diligence
  • Transaction monitoring
  • Reporting suspicious transactions to bodies such as the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN, a US bureau combating financial crimes)

Vendor Management

Vendor management presents additional complexity. As banks increasingly rely on third-party providers for services such as cloud hosting, digital onboarding, and KYC screening, they must ensure that these partners also adhere to relevant regulatory standards. Ongoing monitoring and assessment of vendor compliance is essential to manage risks and avoid potential breaches.

Fostering a Compliance Culture

A strong compliance programme is underpinned by regular audits, comprehensive training, and a culture that prioritises ethical conduct. Compliance officers and senior management play a critical role in fostering this environment, ensuring that all staff understand their responsibilities and that compliance is integrated into daily operations. Regular training and awareness initiatives help embed compliance into the organisational culture, while performance incentives encourage staff to report concerns and uphold regulatory standards.

Common regulatory regimes affecting banks

Although each jurisdiction maintains unique rules, recurring regulatory themes affect almost every bank.

Capital and prudential regulation

Basel III finalisation (often called Basel IV) reaches completion in 2025, introducing output floors at 72.5% of internal model calculations. European CRR/CRD (Capital Requirements Regulation/Directive) packages implement these standards, while Swiss too big to fail rules impose additional capital buffers up to 10% CET1 for systemically important institutions.

AML and CTF obligations

Banks must implement customer due diligence programmes including:

  • Identity verification using biometrics (achieving 95% accuracy)
  • Enhanced due diligence for high-risk clients
  • Politically exposed person monitoring
  • Reporting suspicious transactions
  • Five-year record retention

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) oversees US reporting requirements, while EU directives mandate public beneficial ownership registers.

KYC and digital onboarding

Remote onboarding accelerated 300% during the COVID-19 pandemic. Identity verification through video and eIDAS (Electronic Identification, Authentication and Trust Services)-compliant electronic signatures became standard. Banks must:

  • Verify identity
  • Confirm beneficial ownership
  • Conduct risk-based profiling

Sanctions screening

Banks screen against multiple sanctions lists:

  • OFAC (Office of Foreign Assets Control) Specially Designated Nationals list (10,000+ entries)
  • EU consolidated sanctions
  • UK autonomous sanctions
  • UN Security Council designations

Real-time screening of payments and clients is mandatory, with lists updated weekly.

Data protection

GDPR’s (General Data Protection Regulation) seven principles govern personal data processing across the EU. Banks must:

  • Conduct data protection impact assessments
  • Appoint data protection officers
  • Report breaches within 72 hours

Conduct and product governance

MiFID II (Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II), the Consumer Protection Act provisions, and local regulations like the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA, a US law protecting consumers in real estate transactions) and Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA) govern how banks interact with retail customers. The Lending Act and truth in lending requirements mandate clear disclosure of terms.

InvestGlass supports these regimes through configurable KYC forms, screening integrations, suitability questionnaires, and secure data hosting.

Cross-border and multi-jurisdictional compliance

Many banks and wealth managers serve clients across multiple countries, introducing complex cross-border compliance challenges.

Regulatory divergence

Regulations differ significantly between regions:

Region

Key Differences

European Union

Strict data export rules, GDPR, MiFID II

United Kingdom

Post-Brexit divergence, FCA Consumer Duty

Switzerland

Banking secrecy, FINMA supervision

Gulf Cooperation Council

Data localisation, Islamic finance

Asia-Pacific

Varied suitability standards

Conflicts and frictions

Banks must reconcile strict EU data export rules (following Schrems II, a landmark EU court decision on data transfers) with foreign regulatory reporting requirements. Managing different suitability and investor categorisation rules across jurisdictions requires careful governance.

Oversight of international operations

Regulators expect comprehensive oversight of branches, subsidiaries, and booking centres. The ECB’s (European Central Bank) Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) directly oversees banks holding EUR 30 trillion in assets with consolidated compliance reporting requirements.

Using a central, sovereign platform like InvestGlass, where client data can be hosted in Switzerland or on-premise and segregated by jurisdiction, helps banks manage cross-border constraints while ensuring compliance and preserving client data control.

Technology, RegTech and automation in regulatory compliance

Manual, spreadsheet-based compliance processes cannot adequately handle the volume and complexity of regulatory obligations facing financial institutions in 2025 and beyond.

RegTech categories

Key technology categories supporting compliance in the financial sector include:

Artificial intelligence applications

Machine learning identifies suspicious behaviours, reduces false positives in transaction monitoring, and highlights emerging risks. However, regulators require explainability of AI decisions, particularly in consumer compliance contexts. Financial reporting automation reduces manual errors and promotes financial stability through accurate data.

Secure client portals

Modern client portals comply with both conduct and data privacy rules through strong authentication, consent management, and encrypted document exchange. Financial statements and portfolio information flow securely between institutions and clients.

InvestGlass capabilities

InvestGlass delivers sovereign Swiss RegTech and CRM capabilities:

  • Integrated onboarding reducing processing time by 50%
  • KYC automation with configurable risk scoring
  • Portfolio management integrated with compliance workflows
  • Marketing automation for regulated communications
  • Swiss or on-premise hosting independent of American or Chinese cloud providers

Automation triggers alerts and approval workflows based on risk thresholds, supporting compliance strategies that scale with business growth.

Data sovereignty, privacy and the InvestGlass Swiss approach

Data sovereignty (the concept that data is subject to the laws and governance structures of the country where it is stored) has become a strategic concern for banks as geopolitical tensions intensify and localisation debates continue.

Why sovereignty matters

Data sovereignty means that data is subject to the laws and governance structures of the country where it is stored. The US CLOUD Act (Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act) enables American authorities to compel disclosure of data held by US providers, regardless of where servers are physically located. Similar concerns apply to Chinese providers under national security legislation.

Many European institutions prefer keeping sensitive financial data within trusted jurisdictions to avoid extraterritorial access risks.

The Swiss model

Switzerland offers a compelling alternative:

  • Political neutrality and stability
  • Strong banking secrecy tradition
  • Revised Federal Act on Data Protection (September 2023) aligned with GDPR
  • Independent judiciary and rule of law

InvestGlass deployment options

InvestGlass offers hosting in Swiss infrastructure or fully on-premise deployment. Banks, private banking institutions, asset managers, and public organisations retain full control of:

  • Client data and configurations
  • Encryption keys
  • System access and audit logs

This sovereign model supports compliance with GDPR, Swiss data protection law, and local banking secrecy requirements while delivering modern CRM, onboarding, and compliance automation.

InvestGlass is an ideal choice for institutions seeking to future-proof their compliance stack with a European, non-US, non-Chinese solution built specifically for regulated financial services.

Practical steps and checklist for enhancing regulatory compliance

This section provides actionable guidance that compliance officers and leaders can use immediately to assess and strengthen their frameworks.

Gap Analysis and Prioritisation

  1. Conduct gap analysis against key regulations (Basel III, AML rules, data protection).
  2. Refresh the regulatory inventory with current requirements.
  3. Prioritise remediation based on risk and regulatory penalties exposure.
  4. Document findings for board reporting.

Governance Upgrades

  • Clarify compliance department roles and reporting lines.
  • Update compliance committee terms of reference.
  • Establish direct escalation routes to board level.
  • Implement accountability mapping for senior management.

Technology Modernisation

Replace fragmented processes with integrated platforms:

Current State

Target State

Spreadsheet tracking

Automated workflow management

Email-based approvals

Digital approval with audit trails

Manual KYC

Automated customer due diligence

Periodic reviews

Continuous monitoring

Process Automation

Implement or improve:

  • Automated customer due diligence with risk-based triggers.
  • Transaction monitoring with ML (machine learning)-enhanced detection.
  • Sanctions screening against updated watchlists.
  • Periodic review workflows with escalation.

Culture and Training

  • Conduct regular risk assessments of training effectiveness.
  • Deploy scenario exercises (AML typology simulations, data breach drills).
  • Link performance metrics to compliance outcomes.
  • Measure and manage risks through culture surveys.

InvestGlass enables rapid execution of this banking regulatory compliance checklist through its sovereign CRM, digital onboarding, compliance workflow, and client portal capabilities.

Conclusion: turning regulatory compliance into a strategic advantage

Regulatory compliance in banking has evolved beyond penalty avoidance into a foundation for building resilient, trustworthy, and competitive institutions. The financial industry increasingly recognises that compliance capabilities differentiate market leaders from laggards.

Integrated, technology-enabled compliance frameworks enable banks to respond to regulatory changes quickly while preserving client experience and operational efficiency. Ensuring regulatory compliance becomes more achievable when systems work together rather than in silos.

Data sovereignty and control over critical systems are increasingly decisive factors for boards and regulators across the banking sector. European institutions in particular seek alternatives to American and Chinese technology dependencies.

InvestGlass offers a Swiss, sovereign, end-to-end platform combining CRM, digital onboarding, portfolio management, and compliance automation. For banks and wealth managers seeking a regulation-ready solution that protects client data sovereignty, InvestGlass provides a natural choice.

Consider assessing your current compliance and data sovereignty posture. Explore how adopting a sovereign platform can improve regulatory readiness and promote financial stability for the decade ahead.

Related articles


Swiss Sovereign CRM: Built on AI.
Ready to act.

Main-InvestGlass-Features-Circle