{"id":49334,"date":"2026-03-23T10:07:18","date_gmt":"2026-03-23T09:07:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/?p=49334"},"modified":"2026-03-23T10:42:13","modified_gmt":"2026-03-23T09:42:13","slug":"conformita-e-gestione-del-rischio-nel-settore-bancario","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/it\/compliance-and-risk-management-in-banking\/","title":{"rendered":"Il tuo istituto di credito supererebbe un audit a sorpresa domani?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Global fines for anti money laundering and sanctions violations exceeded USD 5 billion worldwide in 2023, with enforcement actions continuing to surge through 2024 and 2025. This escalating regulatory pressure reflects how central compliance and risk management in <a rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/it\/come-avviare-la-propria-banca-privata\/\" target=\"_self\">bancario \u00e8 diventato<\/a> to institutional survival. Banks today face a landscape where a single control failure can result in nine-figure penalties, operational disruption, and lasting reputational damage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This guide examines the essential components of compliance risk management for financial institutions, from governance frameworks and regulatory expectations to practical implementation strategies. We also explore how modern technology platforms, particularly <a rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/it\/cosa-significa-sovrano\/\" target=\"_self\">sovrano<\/a> European solutions like InvestGlass, enable banks to operationalise compliance controls efficiently while maintaining full control over sensitive client data.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-introduction-to-compliance-and-risk-management-in-banking\">Introduction to Compliance and Risk Management in Banking<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The post-2008 financial crisis era fundamentally reshaped how banks manage risk. Basel III frameworks introduced stringent capital and liquidity requirements, while the EU\u2019s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), effective from 2018, imposed data privacy standards with fines reaching 4% of global annual turnover. The accelerating enforcement environment through 2023 to 2025 has left no room for compliance complacency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">General banking risk management encompasses credit risk from borrower defaults, market risk from fluctuations in interest rates and asset prices, liquidity risk from funding shortfalls, and operational risk from internal process failures or external events. A key component of operational risk is cybersecurity risk, which involves the threat of cyberattacks targeting a bank\u2019s digital systems, potentially resulting in system failures, data breaches, and operational disruptions. Compliance risk management, by contrast, specifically targets the potential for legal penalties, financial losses, or reputational harm due to breaches of laws, regulations, codes of conduct, or internal policies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">These domains intersect significantly. AML failures can trigger operational disruptions through remediation costs while simultaneously causing reputational damage from public enforcement actions. Complex banking organisations must therefore view compliance not as a standalone function but as an integral part of their broader risk management programme. Effective banking risk management requires comprehensive strategies that safeguard institutional stability, ensure regulatory compliance, and protect against a range of threats, including cyber and liquidity risks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Recent developments such as the EU\u2019s AMLD6 and MiFID II enhancements have elevated expectations for automated monitoring and client suitability assessments. Regulatory agencies now expect banks to demonstrate proactive risk mitigation rather than reactive correction. In this context, compliance strategies are essential for meeting regulatory demands and enabling continuous, proactive compliance monitoring. This shift has made technology essential to effective compliance monitoring.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In this environment, platforms like InvestGlass emerge as Swiss-based, sovereign CRM and RegTech solutions. These tools enable banks to operationalise compliance controls, including KYC workflows and sanctions screening, without dependency on American or Chinese vendors. This approach addresses data sovereignty concerns prevalent across Europe and the Middle East, where banking institutions increasingly seek to protect client data from extraterritorial legislation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-what-is-compliance-risk-management-in-banking\">What Is Compliance Risk Management in Banking?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/it\/mitigazione-del-rischio-di-compliance-nel-settore-bancario-buone-pratiche-per-il-successo\/\" target=\"_self\">Compliance risk in banking<\/a> is defined as the potential for legal or regulatory sanctions, material financial loss, or reputational damage resulting from failures to adhere to applicable laws, regulations, codes of conduct, and internal policies. This definition, echoed in Basel Committee guidance and frameworks from the UK\u2019s PRA and FCA, forms the foundation for how banks manage compliance risk by establishing comprehensive programmes to identify, assess, control, and monitor compliance risks across the organisation. Such programmes require a firmwide approach, effective oversight, and integration into overall corporate governance and culture.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Compliance risk differs from other banking risk types while remaining deeply interconnected with them. Credit risk involves loan defaults quantified through probability of default models. Market risk is measured via value-at-risk metrics. Liquidity risk uses liquidity coverage ratios. Operational risk encompasses system failures and human error. Yet interactions are profound: AML control breakdowns lead to operational losses from remediation costs and reputational hits from public scandals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Key regulatory sources shaping compliance requirements for 2024 and beyond include:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Basel Committee principles on compliance and operational resilience<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>FATF\u2019s 40 Recommendations, updated in 2023 for virtual assets and proliferation financing<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>EU directives including AMLD6 for high-risk sectors and MiFID II for market integrity<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>GDPR for data processing and protection<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>UK PRA and FCA rules under PS24\/16 for third-party resilience<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Swiss FINMA circulars such as 2016\/8 on risk management emphasising board oversight<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The core objectives of a compliance risk management framework revolve around prevention through policy design, detection via monitoring systems, response with incident escalation protocols, and continuous improvement informed by testing and audits. This forms a cyclical lifecycle aligned with the three lines of defence model.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Modern banks structure compliance within this model, with the first line comprising business ownership, the second line including compliance and risk functions providing oversight, and the third line consisting of independent audit. Compliance functions in the second line conduct independent monitoring, report directly to the board, and leverage technology for real-time alerts. This structure supports effective risk management across all banking operations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-major-compliance-risks-and-banking-risk-types\">Major Compliance Risks and Banking Risk Types<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Compliance risk cuts across all major banking risk types and products in both retail and wholesale segments. Understanding how these risks interact helps <a rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/it\/come-lanciare-una-banca-una-guida-passo-passo-per-gli-imprenditori\/\" target=\"_self\">banks build<\/a> more effective compliance programs that address potential compliance risks before they materialise into regulatory enforcement or financial penalties.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-anti-money-laundering-and-counter-terrorism-financing\">Anti Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Failures in transaction monitoring have led to substantial penalties. Danske Bank received a \u20ac1.1 billion fine in 2022 for laundering through its Estonian branch. These cases demonstrate how AML failures can devastate a bank&#8217;s risk profile and financial stability, highlighting the need for banks to regularly update their risk management strategies to reflect changes in their bank&#8217;s risk profile. Effective compliance monitoring in this area requires robust transaction surveillance and suspicious activity reporting aligned with FATF standards to combat money laundering and terrorist financing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-sanctions-and-kyc\">Sanctions and KYC<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Sanctions screening failures carry severe consequences. Commerzbank faced $1.45 billion in fines in 2023 for Iranian transaction violations. Meanwhile, HSBC paid $1.9 billion to US authorities in 2022 for weak KYC controls. Customer due diligence requirements continue to intensify, particularly around beneficial ownership verification and politically exposed persons screening.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-data-privacy-and-cybersecurity\">Data Privacy and Cybersecurity<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Under GDPR, Amazon received a \u20ac746 million fine in 2021, while data breaches like Capital One\u2019s 2019 incident exposed 100 million records. Cybersecurity compliance risk now ranks among the highest priorities for banking sector supervisors, with data breaches creating both regulatory exposure and reputational risk. Protecting sensitive customer data has become a core compliance obligation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-consumer-protection-and-market-conduct\">Consumer Protection and Market Conduct<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Regulatory requirements around fair lending, suitability, and market abuse continue expanding. MiFID II mandates detailed record-keeping and best execution proof. Non compliance with conduct rules can trigger both financial penalties and restrictions on business activities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Traditional banking risk types are amplified by compliance shortfalls. Poor KYC heightens credit risk through undetected fraudulent borrowers. Sanctions breaches erode liquidity risk via asset freezes. Operational risk surges from manual process errors, and reputational risk cascades from all categories. Cross-border and private banking face acute challenges with complex beneficial ownership structures obscured by trusts or shell entities, demanding advanced data interoperability across fraud, sanctions, and laundering typologies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-regulatory-expectations-and-governance-of-compliance-risk\">Regulatory Expectations and Governance of Compliance Risk<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">International standards from the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and FATF Recommendations mandate enterprise-wide compliance risk management. Local supervisors echo these expectations. The US Federal Reserve emphasises forward-looking modelling in CECL and ALM processes. The ECB focuses on material risks in SSM reviews. The UK PRA and FCA under PS24\/16 require third-party resilience testing. Swiss FINMA\u2019s circular 2018\/3 demands integrated risk data aggregation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Firm-Wide Compliance Oversight<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In large banking groups, oversight typically involves a global head of compliance setting standards, regional compliance officers adapting to local regulatory demands, and country-level officers ensuring execution. Firm-wide policies must map to entity-specific requirements such as FATCA for US reporting obligations. This structure ensures consistent risk management practices across jurisdictions while respecting local regulatory environment differences.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Board Responsibilities<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Boards bear ultimate responsibility for compliance governance. Key duties include approving compliance risk appetite statements, overseeing framework efficacy, receiving quarterly breach reports with root-cause analyses, and challenging management on remediation timelines. Failures at board level have led to director disqualifications in cases like the UK\u2019s HBOS scandal. Effective boards establish clear risk tolerance levels and ensure compliance functions have adequate independence and resources.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Senior Management Obligations<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Senior management must foster a strong compliance culture through tone from the top. This includes allocating adequate budgets, often 1 to 2 percent of revenue for compliance functions, integrating compliance risks into strategy and variable remuneration through clawbacks for breaches, and establishing escalation channels such as 24-hour hotlines. Independence is ensured via direct board access, separate reporting lines from business units, and performance metrics decoupled from revenue targets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Compliance officers must have authority to escalate issues without fear of retaliation and sufficient resources to monitor risks effectively. This governance structure supports maintain regulatory compliance across complex banking organizations while enabling rapid response to compliance issues as they arise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-core-components-of-a-bank-compliance-risk-management-framework\">Core Components of a Bank Compliance Risk Management Framework<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A structured compliance risk management lifecycle begins with risk identification via firm-wide assessments scanning products, jurisdictions, and clients. It progresses through assessment using scoring models and heat maps, control design, monitoring, testing, reporting, and training. Each component must be informed by regulatory inventories mapping laws to internal policies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-regulatory-and-policy-inventory-management\">Regulatory and Policy Inventory Management<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Banks must maintain centralised repositories tracking regulatory changes across multiple jurisdictions. This includes mapping requirements from GDPR\u2019s data minimisation principles, AMLD6\u2019s beneficial ownership registers, FATCA\u2019s 30% withholding penalties, and local acts like Switzerland\u2019s Banking Act Article 10 on due diligence. Policies require version control and linkage to business processes for audit trails.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-risk-identification-and-assessment\">Risk Identification and Assessment<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Periodic enterprise risk assessments, mandated yearly by supervisors like FINMA, form the foundation of risk identification. Product and jurisdiction scoring evaluates inherent risks, with high-risk designations for areas like crypto services or PEP relationships. Risk taxonomies categorise exposures into typologies, while heat maps visualise concentrations. Regulators increasingly demand evidence of scenario analysis beyond static baselines.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-internal-control-design\">Internal Control Design<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Control implementation includes customer onboarding workflows with biometric verification reducing onboarding from weeks to hours, transaction monitoring rules flagging anomalies via AI thresholds, sanctions screening against comprehensive watchlists with fuzzy matching, data access via role-based controls under GDPR, and record-keeping for retention periods extending to 10 years per MiFID II requirements.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-compliance-monitoring-and-testing\">Compliance Monitoring and Testing<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Second-line compliance functions execute annual monitoring plans with thematic reviews covering areas such as trade finance. Sample testing at 95% confidence levels validates control effectiveness. Coordination with internal audit as the third line ensures comprehensive coverage. Modern compliance processes centralise documentation for remote examinations where regulators rely on self-standing reports.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-training-and-culture\">Training and Culture<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Mandatory annual e-learning programmes with 90% or higher completion rates, tracked via dashboards, support compliance activities across the organisation. Role-specific training for front-office staff addresses conduct risks and industry standards. Leadership communications reinforce ethical standards, with high-performing banks reporting 25 to 30 percent reductions in breach incidents through sustained culture programmes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-risk-based-compliance-management-and-enterprise-wide-integration\">Risk-based Compliance Management and Enterprise-wide Integration<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Risk-based compliance management allocates resources proportional to materiality, prioritising high-risk areas like cross-border PEP relationships or crypto products over lower-risk retail deposits. This approach aligns with 2025 regulatory shifts toward risk-based supervision, where examination cycles extend for well-controlled institutions while laggards face intensified scrutiny.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Banks define compliance risk appetite through board-approved statements incorporating quantitative limits, such as alert false positive rates below 1%. Key risk indicators track metrics including overdue KYC reviews and sanctions screening hits. Thresholds trigger escalations, with amber warnings at 80% utilisation and red alerts at 100%. Automated dashboards provide real-time oversight for risk exposure across business lines.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Integration into enterprise risk management embeds compliance within ICAAP and ICLAAP processes, where compliance failures directly impact capital buffers under Pillar 2. Unified data platforms model interactions, such as how cyber breaches might erode liquidity through operational disruption. This integration ensures enterprise risk frameworks capture compliance dimensions alongside traditional risk types.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Governance, risk, and compliance platforms unify these efforts by standardising taxonomies with shared risk codes across branches. This enables group-wide aggregation from subsidiaries via APIs, addressing organisational silos that affect approximately 70% of banks according to industry surveys.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A practical example involves quarterly enterprise risk assessments feeding into scenario analysis simulating events like mass sanctions updates. These link key risk indicators to early warning indicators for board review, fostering proactive adjustments amid volatile rates and deposit competition. This risk management process supports ongoing compliance even as the regulatory environment evolves.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-credit-risk-management-in-banking\">Credit Risk Management in Banking<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Credit risk management is a cornerstone of risk management in banking, as it directly impacts a bank\u2019s financial health and regulatory standing. Credit risk refers to the possibility that borrowers may fail to meet their financial obligations, resulting in loan defaults or non-payment. To manage this risk, banks employ a range of risk management practices designed to identify, assess, and mitigate potential losses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A robust credit risk assessment process is essential. This involves evaluating the creditworthiness of borrowers by analysing their financial history, credit scores, income statements, and other relevant factors. Banks use sophisticated credit scoring models and risk assessment tools to quantify the likelihood of default, enabling them to make informed lending decisions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">To further manage credit risk, banks set credit limits for individual borrowers and sectors, ensuring that exposure remains within acceptable boundaries. Loan provisioning is another key practice, requiring banks to set aside reserves to cover potential losses from non-performing loans. These provisions are regularly reviewed and adjusted based on ongoing risk assessment and changes in the economic environment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In addition to internal controls, banks may use external risk management tools such as credit derivatives and credit insurance to transfer or mitigate credit risk. These instruments provide an additional layer of protection, particularly in volatile markets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Maintaining regulatory compliance is integral to effective credit risk management. Regulatory frameworks require banks to adhere to strict standards for risk assessment, provisioning, and reporting. By implementing sound risk management practices, banks not only protect themselves from financial losses but also ensure they meet regulatory requirements and support the overall stability of the financial system.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-liquidity-risk-management-in-banking\">Liquidity Risk Management in Banking<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Liquidity risk management is a vital aspect of risk management in banking, focusing on a bank\u2019s ability to meet its short-term financial obligations as they come due. Liquidity risk arises when a bank is unable to fulfil withdrawal requests, repay debts, or fund new loans without incurring significant losses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">To manage liquidity risk, banks maintain sufficient liquidity reserves, such as cash and highly liquid assets, which can be quickly accessed in times of need. Diversifying funding sources is another key strategy, reducing reliance on any single source and enhancing resilience against market disruptions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Effective liquidity risk management also involves comprehensive risk assessment. Banks regularly evaluate their liquidity position by analysing cash flows, the maturity profile of assets and liabilities, and the stability of funding sources. Asset-liability management (ALM) techniques are used to align the timing of cash inflows and outflows, minimising the risk of liquidity shortfalls.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Banks implement contingency funding plans to prepare for unexpected liquidity events, such as market shocks or sudden increases in withdrawal demands. These plans outline strategies for raising additional funds quickly, including accessing central bank facilities or selling liquid assets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Regulatory compliance plays a crucial role in liquidity risk management. Supervisory authorities require banks to maintain minimum liquidity coverage ratios and conduct regular stress tests to ensure financial stability. By adhering to these requirements and adopting best practices in liquidity risk management, banks can safeguard their operations, maintain customer confidence, and contribute to the stability of the broader financial system.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-data-privacy-in-banking-compliance\">Data Privacy in Banking Compliance<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Data privacy is a fundamental component of regulatory compliance in the banking sector, given the sensitive nature of customer information handled by financial institutions. Protecting sensitive customer data from unauthorised access, disclosure, or misuse is not only a legal obligation but also essential for maintaining customer trust and safeguarding reputational integrity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Banks manage data privacy risk by implementing comprehensive compliance programs that include data encryption, robust access controls, and clear data breach notification procedures. These measures help ensure that only authorised personnel can access sensitive information, and that any incidents are promptly identified and addressed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Compliance with data privacy regulations, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), is mandatory for banks operating in relevant jurisdictions. These regulations set stringent requirements for data collection, processing, storage, and sharing, with significant penalties for non-compliance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">To further mitigate data privacy risk, banks deploy risk management tools such as data loss prevention systems and incident response plans. Regular risk assessments and audits are conducted to identify potential vulnerabilities and ensure ongoing compliance with evolving regulatory standards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Effective data privacy compliance programs not only help banks meet regulatory requirements but also protect against reputational risk and financial penalties associated with data breaches. By prioritising the security of sensitive customer data, banks reinforce their commitment to ethical business practices and long-term customer relationships.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-anti-money-laundering-and-financial-crime-prevention\">Anti-Money Laundering and Financial Crime Prevention<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Anti-money laundering (AML) and financial crime prevention are critical pillars of compliance risk management in the banking industry. These efforts are designed to prevent and detect money laundering, terrorist financing, and other illicit financial activities that threaten the integrity of the legitimate financial system.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Banks manage AML risk by establishing comprehensive compliance programs that include customer due diligence (CDD), ongoing transaction monitoring, and prompt suspicious activity reporting. CDD processes involve verifying the identity of clients, understanding the nature of their business, and assessing the risk they pose. Enhanced due diligence is applied to high-risk customers, such as politically exposed persons (PEPs) or those from high-risk jurisdictions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Transaction monitoring systems use advanced analytics and risk-based rules to identify unusual or suspicious patterns that may indicate money laundering or terrorist financing. When potential compliance risks are detected, banks are required to file suspicious activity reports with relevant authorities, ensuring regulatory compliance and supporting law enforcement efforts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Compliance with AML regulations, such as the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) and the USA PATRIOT Act, is mandatory for banks operating in affected jurisdictions. These laws set out detailed requirements for record-keeping, reporting, and internal controls.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">To enhance their AML compliance programs, banks utilise risk management tools such as AML software, forensic analysis, and regular staff training. These measures help mitigate the risk of financial crime, protect the bank\u2019s reputation, and maintain financial stability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">By prioritising anti-money laundering and financial crime prevention, banks demonstrate their commitment to upholding regulatory standards, safeguarding the financial system, and protecting their clients from the risks associated with illicit financial activities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-technology-automation-and-data-sovereignty-in-banking-compliance\">Technology, Automation and Data Sovereignty in Banking Compliance<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Banks leverage automation, AI, and workflow tools to navigate over 10,000 annual regulatory updates. Machine learning models in AML systems detect 40% more suspicious patterns than rules-based approaches. Digital <a rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/it\/cose-la-verifica-dellidentita-e-come-funziona\/\" target=\"_self\">verifica dell'identit\u00e0<\/a> reduces manual KYC reviews by 70%. Real-time API feeds enable continuous sanctions screening, while XBRL standardisation streamlines financial reporting to regulatory agencies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/it\/ottimizzare-lonboarding-digitale-per-il-corporate-banking-best-practice-e-strategie-chiave\/\" target=\"_self\">Onboarding digitale<\/a> platforms integrate e-signatures, OCR for document extraction, and risk scoring algorithms. These tools slash onboarding times from weeks to days while ensuring PEP screening and adverse media checks occur seamlessly. Error rates fall below 1% in well-implemented systems, dramatically improving compliance procedures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Regulatory focus on data sovereignty intensifies following EU Schrems II invalidating certain US data transfers. Switzerland\u2019s FADP 2023 mirrors GDPR requirements, while FINMA mandates impact assessments for cloud outsourcing. These developments prioritise intra-Swiss hosting to avoid CLOUD Act exposures and protect data privacy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">InvestGlass positions as a Swiss sovereign CRM platform offering integrated CRM, onboarding with <a rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/it\/come-automatizzare-la-verifica-kyc-automatizzare-e-sviluppare-il-gioco\/\" target=\"_self\">KYC automatizzato<\/a> and CDD workflows generating audit-ready reports, portfolio management for MiFID suitability checks, compliance rules engines triggering approvals and reminders, and <a rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/it\/le-5-migliori-soluzioni-di-portale-per-la-condivisione-sicura-dei-file-dei-clienti\/\" target=\"_self\">client portals for secure<\/a> disclosures. The platform can be hosted on-premise or in Swiss data centres.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">European, Middle Eastern, and public sector banks increasingly favour such alternatives to US hyperscalers, which face exposure to extraterritorial laws, and Chinese providers, which carry geopolitical risks. This approach allows banking institutions to retain control over sensitive data while achieving compliance automation. InvestGlass dashboards visualise overdue reviews, automated case management resolves 80% of alerts within 24 hours, and thematic reports support FINMA submissions efficiently.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-practical-best-practices-for-compliance-and-risk-management-in-banks\">Practical Best Practices for Compliance and Risk Management in Banks<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Establishing a bank-wide compliance governance framework with a centralised GRC system ensures a single source of truth for client data. This approach enables thematic reviews of high-risk areas like trade finance, where correspondent banking lapses have contributed to over $2 billion in global fines since 2020. Banks implementing unified frameworks report 50% faster remediation times for identified risks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-strengthen-identity-verification\">Strengthen Identity Verification<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Robust KYC for clients, KYB for businesses, and KYE for employees using digital biometrics and blockchain-ledgered proofs reduce false negatives by approximately 30%. In addition to verifying clients and business partners, it is essential to verify and authenticate bank employees as part of risk management practices. Implementing Know Your Employee (KYE) measures helps prevent insider threats and ensures staff integrity, which is critical for maintaining a secure banking environment. A European private bank recently averted significant PEP-related fines through automated adverse media scanning integrated with onboarding workflows. These tools support compliance efforts while improving client experience.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-automate-key-workflows\">Automate Key Workflows<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Automation priorities include alert case management prioritising high-risk hits, approval routing for high-risk clients, periodic KYC triggers based on materiality such as 12-month cycles for PEPs, and regulator reporting via pre-filled XBRL templates. Banks achieve 60% reductions in manual effort and 100% reporting timeliness through systematic automation of compliance processes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-deploy-continuous-monitoring\">Deploy Continuous Monitoring<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Dashboards tracking metrics enable proactive management:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Metrico<\/p><\/th><th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Obiettivo<\/p><\/th><th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Escalation Trigger<\/p><\/th><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Overdue KYC reviews<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Sotto 5%<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Above 10%<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Open compliance incidents<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Below 10% backlog<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Above 15%<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Training completion<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Sopra 95%<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Below 90%<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Sanctions hits reconciliation<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Giornaliero<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Any delay<\/p><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-conduct-scenario-analysis\">Conduct Scenario Analysis<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Regular stress testing of compliance controls simulates mass sanctions updates, such as the 2022 Russia response affecting 10,000 entities, or sudden transaction spikes. Banks practising systematic scenario analysis report 40% lower breach impacts. This approach identifies control gaps before they materialise and informs <a rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/it\/le-migliori-pratiche-per-sviluppare-un-solido-piano-di-emergenza\/\" target=\"_self\">contingency plans<\/a> for regulatory change management.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-how-investglass-supports-bank-compliance-and-risk-management\">How InvestGlass Supports Bank Compliance and Risk Management<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">From InvestGlass\u2019s perspective, its <a rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/it\/crm-per-i-servizi-finanziari\/\" target=\"_self\">CRM Svizzera<\/a> platform centralises client data, documentation, and interaction history into immutable audit trails. This structure supports instant evidence production for regulators like FINMA during on-site inspections, ensuring banking operations maintain transparency throughout regulatory reviews.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Digital Onboarding and KYC Workflows<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">InvestGlass automates identity verification, document upload with AI validation, risk scoring integrating sanctions, PEP, and watchlist checks, and e-signatures. The platform generates compliance certificates automatically while flagging high-risk cases for manual review. Onboarding times reduce to hours rather than weeks, with audit-ready documentation created throughout the process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Rules-based Approvals and Document Management<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Customisable workflow engines support client tier-based approvals, triggering escalations for complex ownership structures. Integration with core banking systems ensures seamless data flow. The integrated document management system stores records with GDPR-compliant access logs, versioning, and retention policies, enabling thematic searches during audits.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Gestione del portafoglio e portale clienti<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The portfolio management module facilitates MiFID II suitability assessments through automated checks against client profiles. The secure client portal enables disclosure delivery and communication logging, providing conduct proof and supporting legal obligations around client communication records.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Sovereign Hosting<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Swiss hosting or on-premise deployment ensures data residency under FADP, avoiding US CLOUD Act risks entirely. This positions InvestGlass as the automation solution for independence-focused institutions, achieving 99% uptime and 50% cost savings over legacy systems while protecting client data sovereignty. Financial institutions seeking to avoid systematic risk from extraterritorial legislation find particular value in this approach.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-conclusion-and-future-trends-in-banking-compliance\">Conclusion and Future Trends in Banking Compliance<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Sound compliance and risk management underpins financial stability by averting systematic risk, sustaining customer trust through transparent controls, and bolstering regulator confidence via demonstrable resilience. Post-2008 reforms have stabilised capital ratios above 12% globally, demonstrating the value of robust frameworks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Emerging trends for 2025 to 2027 include ESG disclosures under EU SFDR mandating double materiality assessments, AI supervision with regulators piloting model audits for bias in credit decisions, convergence of financial crimes and cybersecurity threats, and heightened scrutiny of cross-border data transfers. The banking industry must adapt to these evolving regulatory requirements.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Integrated, risk-based frameworks leveraging sovereign technology will prove pivotal in this environment. Mitigating risks requires unified data platforms providing holistic views while respecting data sovereignty principles. Banks should audit their current architectures for silos and sovereignty gaps, piloting European platforms to safeguard sensitive customer data and institutional autonomy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For institutions ready to strengthen their compliance and risk management capabilities, InvestGlass offers a Swiss sovereign solution purpose-built for the financial system. Consider reviewing your current compliance architecture and exploring how sovereign European technology can protect both your clients and your independence in an increasingly complex regulatory environment.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Global fines for anti money laundering and sanctions violations exceeded USD 5 billion worldwide in 2023, with enforcement actions continuing to surge through 2024 and 2025. This escalating regulatory pressure reflects how central compliance and risk management in banking has become to institutional survival. Banks today face a landscape where a single control failure can [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":46061,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[968,1006],"class_list":["post-49334","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-article","tag-compliance","tag-risk-management"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.6.1 (Yoast SEO v27.7) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Compliance and Risk Management in Banking Explained<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Explore the importance of compliance and risk management in banking to avoid penalties and ensure operational stability.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/it\/conformita-e-gestione-del-rischio-nel-settore-bancario\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"it_IT\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Would Your Bank Pass a Surprise Audit Tomorrow?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Global fines for anti money laundering and sanctions violations exceeded USD 5 billion worldwide in 2023, with enforcement actions continuing to surge\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/it\/conformita-e-gestione-del-rischio-nel-settore-bancario\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"InvestGlass\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-03-23T09:07:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-03-23T09:42:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/getty-images-5X891zToN1M-unsplash-scaled.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2048\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1367\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"InvestGlass\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@investglass\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@investglass\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Scritto da\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"InvestGlass\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Tempo di lettura stimato\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minuto\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Compliance and Risk Management in Banking Explained","description":"Explore the importance of compliance and risk management in banking to avoid penalties and ensure operational stability.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/it\/conformita-e-gestione-del-rischio-nel-settore-bancario\/","og_locale":"it_IT","og_type":"article","og_title":"Would Your Bank Pass a Surprise Audit Tomorrow?","og_description":"Global fines for anti money laundering and sanctions violations exceeded USD 5 billion worldwide in 2023, with enforcement actions continuing to surge","og_url":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/it\/conformita-e-gestione-del-rischio-nel-settore-bancario\/","og_site_name":"InvestGlass","article_published_time":"2026-03-23T09:07:18+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-03-23T09:42:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2048,"height":1367,"url":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/getty-images-5X891zToN1M-unsplash-scaled.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"InvestGlass","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@investglass","twitter_site":"@investglass","twitter_misc":{"Scritto da":"InvestGlass","Tempo di lettura stimato":"1 minuto"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/compliance-and-risk-management-in-banking\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/compliance-and-risk-management-in-banking\/"},"author":{"name":"InvestGlass","@id":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/#\/schema\/person\/4682ebae5d718a2ed1b77c9dab0a1f24"},"headline":"Would Your Bank Pass a Surprise Audit Tomorrow?","datePublished":"2026-03-23T09:07:18+00:00","dateModified":"2026-03-23T09:42:13+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/compliance-and-risk-management-in-banking\/"},"wordCount":4051,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/compliance-and-risk-management-in-banking\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/getty-images-5X891zToN1M-unsplash-scaled.jpg","keywords":["Compliance","Risk Management"],"articleSection":["Article"],"inLanguage":"it-IT","copyrightYear":"2026","copyrightHolder":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/it\/#organization"}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/compliance-and-risk-management-in-banking\/","url":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/compliance-and-risk-management-in-banking\/","name":"Compliance and Risk Management in Banking Explained","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/compliance-and-risk-management-in-banking\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/compliance-and-risk-management-in-banking\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/getty-images-5X891zToN1M-unsplash-scaled.jpg","datePublished":"2026-03-23T09:07:18+00:00","dateModified":"2026-03-23T09:42:13+00:00","description":"Explore the importance of compliance and risk management in banking to avoid penalties and ensure operational stability.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/compliance-and-risk-management-in-banking\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"it-IT","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/compliance-and-risk-management-in-banking\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"it-IT","@id":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/compliance-and-risk-management-in-banking\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/getty-images-5X891zToN1M-unsplash-scaled.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/getty-images-5X891zToN1M-unsplash-scaled.jpg","width":2048,"height":1367,"caption":"Enhancing Underwriting and Risk Assessment"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/compliance-and-risk-management-in-banking\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"InvestGlass","item":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Would Your Bank Pass a Surprise Audit Tomorrow?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/","name":"InvestGlass","description":"Il sovrano svizzero CRM","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/#organization"},"alternateName":"InvestGlass","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"it-IT"},{"@type":["Organization","Place"],"@id":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/#organization","name":"InvestGlass","url":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/","logo":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/compliance-and-risk-management-in-banking\/#local-main-organization-logo"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/compliance-and-risk-management-in-banking\/#local-main-organization-logo"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/x.com\/investglass","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/investglass\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCt5r5XgzbSq2KhguJQxCwyA"],"telephone":[],"openingHoursSpecification":[{"@type":"OpeningHoursSpecification","dayOfWeek":["Monday","Tuesday","Wednesday","Thursday","Friday","Saturday","Sunday"],"opens":"09:00","closes":"17:00"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/#\/schema\/person\/4682ebae5d718a2ed1b77c9dab0a1f24","name":"InvestGlass","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"it-IT","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8fb928ff37ca45def17ac75d6e799fb75f3f24f123aa31be169bfaf65f59dd40?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8fb928ff37ca45def17ac75d6e799fb75f3f24f123aa31be169bfaf65f59dd40?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8fb928ff37ca45def17ac75d6e799fb75f3f24f123aa31be169bfaf65f59dd40?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"InvestGlass"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.investglass.com"],"url":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/it\/author\/axginvestglass-com\/"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"it-IT","@id":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/compliance-and-risk-management-in-banking\/#local-main-organization-logo","url":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/InvestGlass-blue2.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/InvestGlass-blue2.png","width":839,"height":192,"caption":"InvestGlass"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49334","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=49334"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49334\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/46061"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=49334"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=49334"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investglass.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=49334"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}